On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:12:53AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 09:43:32PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > The wait-request interface still has the wait-seqno legacy of having to > > acquire the reset_counter under the mutex before calling. That is quite > > hairy and causes a major complication later where we want to amalgamate > > waiters. > > Yeah, that's a sensible change. But since I don't yet understand where > exactly the current logic results in a wedge gpu I can't convince myself > that the new one is ok. Just to show where I am going with the interface change and why I think it so important (other than it removes a hairy dance that we've have had to copy all around the code): http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/commit/?h=nightly&id=75e73616f72f14ab82037adb1b2b054e2e500c21 -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
