On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:51:09AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 09:25:14AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > And something like .fill_modes -> .probe (after removing .detect). > > Hm, not sure. For panels we never really probe anything, the important bit > is (at least for the caller in drm_crtc.c) that it fills in the > connectore->modes list. Given that I think the current name is okish. imo .fill_modes() does not imply that it communicates with the output, unlike say .detect(), .probe(), or .get_modes(). -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
