On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:44:20PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 03:22:23PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Cc: Thomas Wood <thomas.wood@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Given that we have all that in piglit already the commit message is a bit > thin on justification. Why do we need this in igt too? How does this > interact with the piglit dmesg capture? It's doesn't interfere with anyone else parsing kmsg/dmesg for themselves, but it adds very useful functionality to standalone igt. Which to me is significantly more valuable and I have been patching it into igt for over a year and wished it was taken more seriously given the number of incorrect bug reports generated. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
