From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
In the following commit:
commit e9f24d5fb7cf3628b195b18ff3ac4e37937ceeae
Author: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Oct 5 13:26:36 2015 +0100
drm/i915: Clean up associated VMAs on context destruction
I added a WARN_ON assertion that VM's active list must be empty
at the time of owning context is getting freed, but that turned
out to be a wrong assumption.
Due ordering of operations in i915_gem_object_retire__read, where
contexts are unreferenced before VMAs are moved to the inactive
list, the described situation can in fact happen.
It feels wrong to do things in such order so this fix makes sure
a reference to context is held until the move to inactive list
is completed.
v2: Rather than hold a temporary context reference move the
request unreference to be the last operation. (Daniel Vetter)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92638
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 98c83286ab68..e2248601e997 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2404,29 +2404,31 @@ i915_gem_object_retire__read(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int ring)
RQ_BUG_ON(!(obj->active & (1 << ring)));
list_del_init(&obj->ring_list[ring]);
- i915_gem_request_assign(&obj->last_read_req[ring], NULL);
if (obj->last_write_req && obj->last_write_req->ring->id == ring)
i915_gem_object_retire__write(obj);
obj->active &= ~(1 << ring);
- if (obj->active)
- return;
- /* Bump our place on the bound list to keep it roughly in LRU order
- * so that we don't steal from recently used but inactive objects
- * (unless we are forced to ofc!)
- */
- list_move_tail(&obj->global_list,
- &to_i915(obj->base.dev)->mm.bound_list);
+ if (!obj->active) {
+ /* Bump our place on the bound list to keep it roughly in LRU order
+ * so that we don't steal from recently used but inactive objects
+ * (unless we are forced to ofc!)
+ */
+ list_move_tail(&obj->global_list,
+ &to_i915(obj->base.dev)->mm.bound_list);
- list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, vma_link) {
- if (!list_empty(&vma->mm_list))
- list_move_tail(&vma->mm_list, &vma->vm->inactive_list);
+ list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, vma_link) {
+ if (!list_empty(&vma->mm_list))
+ list_move_tail(&vma->mm_list,
+ &vma->vm->inactive_list);
+ }
+
+ i915_gem_request_assign(&obj->last_fenced_req, NULL);
+ drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
}
- i915_gem_request_assign(&obj->last_fenced_req, NULL);
- drm_gem_object_unreference(&obj->base);
+ i915_gem_request_assign(&obj->last_read_req[ring], NULL);
}
static int
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
