Em Sex, 2015-11-13 às 15:49 +0000, Daniel Stone escreveu: > Hi Paulo, > > On 4 November 2015 at 19:10, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > So Ville pointed a problem on patch 02/26 of the previous series, > > and the nice > > fix for that would make me rebase most of the subsequent patches. > > In order to > > avoid blocking the other patches on the review of patch 02 and in > > order to avoid > > having to rebase everything again and again during this I decided > > to change the > > order of the patches on the series and try to get a smaller chunk > > of patches > > merged before moving on to the others. > > > > These first 13 patches are somewhat trivial and are mostly just > > moving code > > around, with only one or two simple bug fixes. If you wonder why > > some of these > > changes are needed, please go check the complete series (the short > > answer is: > > most of the changes are needed for the new model with > > enable/disable + > > activate/deactivate). > > > > After all these patches are merged I'll resend the rest. > > This series is missing 01/26 of your previous series (make > no_fbc_reason a string). It was already merged when I resent: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel/commit/?id=bf6189c6f062b5cd6ca0d4 6754e4c3064643f48c > > Cheers, > Daniel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
