Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: Sanitize watermarks after hardware state readout (v2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 02:55:20PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Nov 2015, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 04:12:33PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Tue, 03 Nov 2015, Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > Although we can do a good job of reading out hardware state, the
> >> > graphics firmware may have programmed the watermarks in a creative way
> >> > that doesn't match how i915 would have chosen to program them.  We
> >> > shouldn't trust the firmware's watermark programming, but should rather
> >> > re-calculate how we think WM's should be programmed and then shove those
> >> > values into the hardware.
> >> >
> >> > We can do this pretty easily by creating a dummy top-level state,
> >> > running it through the check process to calculate all the values, and
> >> > then just programming the watermarks for each CRTC.
> >> >
> >> > v2:  Move watermark sanitization after our BIOS fb reconstruction; the
> >> >      watermark calculations that we do here need to look at pstate->fb,
> >> >      which isn't setup yet in intel_modeset_setup_hw_state(), even
> >> >      though we have an enabled & visible plane.
> >> >
> >> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> > ---
> >> > Jani, based on your logs it looks like the culprit is that we're calculating
> >> > watermarks at startup time after we've read out preliminary hardware state (so
> >> > we know the primary plane is enabled & visible), but before we reconstruct the
> >> > BIOS fb (so pstate->fb is NULL).  I think moving the watermark sanitization
> >> > later in the process so that we'll have a proper fb setup should hopefully
> >> > solve the issue.  Can you test this version when you get a chance?  I'll also
> >> > send a rebased patch #4 since the code movement here means that the previous
> >> > version won't apply cleanly.
> >> 
> >> Sorry Matt, black screen with new versions of patches 3-4. Dmesg at
> >> http://pastebin.com/3LXZwvWu
> >
> > Hmm, okay, looks like we're getting closer (successfully avoided the
> > divide by zero problem), but I neglected to grab the necessary locks so
> > the sanitization doesn't actually happen.  Does applying
> > http://paste.debian.net/322932 on top of the series work any better for
> > you?  I haven't had time to pull back out an ILK-style system, so that's
> > only compile-tested at the moment.
> 
> Still warns http://pastebin.com/yGtde5X2
> 
> BR,
> Jani.

Sorry this is taking so long to zero in on.  When you have some free
time would you mind running tag 'forjani/watermark_debug-v1' from

        https://github.com/mattrope/kernel.git

with debug messages turned on?  I was a bit confused by your earlier
logs because apparently some of our startup-time state dumping was
giving misleading/inaccurate information; hopefully with the changes
here, I'll get more useful debug information and better understand
what's leading to the failures on your system.

Thanks again for your help.


Matt

> 
> 
> >
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >> 
> >> BR,
> >> Jani.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> >
> >> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h      |  1 +
> >> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c      | 14 +++++----
> >> >  3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >> > index 20cd6d8..09807c8 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> >> > @@ -629,6 +629,7 @@ struct drm_i915_display_funcs {
> >> >  			  struct dpll *best_clock);
> >> >  	int (*compute_pipe_wm)(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> >> >  			       struct drm_atomic_state *state);
> >> > +	void (*program_watermarks)(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate);
> >> >  	void (*update_wm)(struct drm_crtc *crtc);
> >> >  	int (*modeset_calc_cdclk)(struct drm_atomic_state *state);
> >> >  	void (*modeset_commit_cdclk)(struct drm_atomic_state *state);
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> > index 7b3cfb6..e289311 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >> > @@ -14936,6 +14936,54 @@ void intel_modeset_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev)
> >> >  	intel_enable_gt_powersave(dev);
> >> >  }
> >> >  
> >> > +/*
> >> > + * Calculate what we think the watermarks should be for the state we've read
> >> > + * out of the hardware and then immediately program those watermarks so that
> >> > + * we ensure the hardware settings match our internal state.
> >> > + */
> >> > +static void sanitize_watermarks(struct drm_device *dev)
> >> > +{
> >> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> >> > +	struct drm_atomic_state *state;
> >> > +	struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> >> > +	struct drm_crtc_state *cstate;
> >> > +	int ret;
> >> > +	int i;
> >> > +
> >> > +	/* Only supported on platforms that use atomic watermark design */
> >> > +	if (!dev_priv->display.program_watermarks)
> >> > +		return;
> >> > +
> >> > +	/*
> >> > +	 * Calculate what we think WM's should be by creating a dummy state and
> >> > +	 * running it through the atomic check code.
> >> > +	 */
> >> > +	state = drm_atomic_helper_duplicate_state(dev,
> >> > +						  dev->mode_config.acquire_ctx);
> >> > +	if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(state)))
> >> > +		return;
> >> > +
> >> > +	ret = intel_atomic_check(dev, state);
> >> > +	if (ret) {
> >> > +		/*
> >> > +		 * Just give up and leave watermarks untouched if we get an
> >> > +		 * error back from 'check'
> >> > +		 */
> >> > +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not determine valid watermarks for inherited state\n");
> >> > +		return;
> >> > +	}
> >> > +
> >> > +	/* Write calculated watermark values back */
> >> > +	to_i915(dev)->wm.config = to_intel_atomic_state(state)->wm_config;
> >> > +	for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, cstate, i) {
> >> > +		struct intel_crtc_state *cs = to_intel_crtc_state(cstate);
> >> > +
> >> > +		dev_priv->display.program_watermarks(cs);
> >> > +	}
> >> > +
> >> > +	drm_atomic_state_free(state);
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> >  void intel_modeset_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> >> >  {
> >> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> >> > @@ -15059,6 +15107,13 @@ void intel_modeset_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> >> >  		 */
> >> >  		intel_find_initial_plane_obj(crtc, &plane_config);
> >> >  	}
> >> > +
> >> > +	/*
> >> > +	 * Make sure hardware watermarks really match the state we read out.
> >> > +	 * Note that we need to do this after reconstructing the BIOS fb's
> >> > +	 * since the watermark calculation done here will use pstate->fb.
> >> > +	 */
> >> > +	sanitize_watermarks(dev);
> >> >  }
> >> >  
> >> >  static void intel_enable_pipe_a(struct drm_device *dev)
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >> > index 180348b..fbcb072 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >> > @@ -3611,15 +3611,19 @@ static void skl_update_wm(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> >> >  	dev_priv->wm.skl_hw = *results;
> >> >  }
> >> >  
> >> > -static void ilk_program_watermarks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >> > +static void ilk_program_watermarks(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate)
> >> >  {
> >> > -	struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
> >> > +	struct drm_crtc *crtc = cstate->base.crtc;
> >> > +	struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> >> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> >> >  	struct intel_pipe_wm lp_wm_1_2 = {}, lp_wm_5_6 = {}, *best_lp_wm;
> >> >  	struct ilk_wm_maximums max;
> >> >  	struct intel_wm_config *config = &dev_priv->wm.config;
> >> >  	struct ilk_wm_values results = {};
> >> >  	enum intel_ddb_partitioning partitioning;
> >> >  
> >> > +	to_intel_crtc(crtc)->wm.active.ilk = cstate->wm.optimal.ilk;
> >> > +
> >> >  	ilk_compute_wm_maximums(dev, 1, config, INTEL_DDB_PART_1_2, &max);
> >> >  	ilk_wm_merge(dev, config, &max, &lp_wm_1_2);
> >> >  
> >> > @@ -3644,7 +3648,6 @@ static void ilk_program_watermarks(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >> >  
> >> >  static void ilk_update_wm(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> >> >  {
> >> > -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->dev);
> >> >  	struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
> >> >  	struct intel_crtc_state *cstate = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state);
> >> >  
> >> > @@ -3662,9 +3665,7 @@ static void ilk_update_wm(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> >> >  		intel_wait_for_vblank(crtc->dev, intel_crtc->pipe);
> >> >  	}
> >> >  
> >> > -	intel_crtc->wm.active.ilk = cstate->wm.optimal.ilk;
> >> > -
> >> > -	ilk_program_watermarks(dev_priv);
> >> > +	ilk_program_watermarks(cstate);
> >> >  }
> >> >  
> >> >  static void skl_pipe_wm_active_state(uint32_t val,
> >> > @@ -6972,6 +6973,7 @@ void intel_init_pm(struct drm_device *dev)
> >> >  		     dev_priv->wm.spr_latency[0] && dev_priv->wm.cur_latency[0])) {
> >> >  			dev_priv->display.update_wm = ilk_update_wm;
> >> >  			dev_priv->display.compute_pipe_wm = ilk_compute_pipe_wm;
> >> > +			dev_priv->display.program_watermarks = ilk_program_watermarks;
> >> >  		} else {
> >> >  			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Failed to read display plane latency. "
> >> >  				      "Disable CxSR\n");
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux