Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: refactor stepping info retrieval

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 03:38:33PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> Have only one if ladder for platforms and only one range check for
>>> size. Makes it easier to handle new platforms. Remove the use of
>>> negative return values in char, which might underflow to be positive for
>>> some negative error codes.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> On the series: Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Apparently this conflicts with some other firmware patches. I'll let
> Imre decide if we should give them priority, or just merge these.

Imre gave the green light, series pushed to drm-intel-next-queued,
thanks for the review.

BR,
Jani.


>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
>>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>>>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
>>> index fe9a55cf8212..3e7953254803 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c
>>> @@ -188,28 +188,25 @@ static const struct stepping_info bxt_stepping_info[] = {
>>>  	{'B', '0'}, {'B', '1'}, {'B', '2'}
>>>  };
>>>  
>>> -static char intel_get_stepping(struct drm_device *dev)
>>> +static const struct stepping_info *intel_get_stepping_info(struct drm_device *dev)
>>>  {
>>> -	if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev) && (dev->pdev->revision <
>>> -			ARRAY_SIZE(skl_stepping_info)))
>>> -		return skl_stepping_info[dev->pdev->revision].stepping;
>>> -	else if (IS_BROXTON(dev) && (dev->pdev->revision <
>>> -				ARRAY_SIZE(bxt_stepping_info)))
>>> -		return bxt_stepping_info[dev->pdev->revision].stepping;
>>> -	else
>>> -		return -ENODATA;
>>> -}
>>> +	const struct stepping_info *si;
>>> +	unsigned int size;
>>> +
>>> +	if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev)) {
>>> +		size = ARRAY_SIZE(skl_stepping_info);
>>> +		si = skl_stepping_info;
>>> +	} else if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) {
>>> +		size = ARRAY_SIZE(bxt_stepping_info);
>>> +		si = bxt_stepping_info;
>>> +	} else {
>>> +		return NULL;
>>> +	}
>>>  
>>> -static char intel_get_substepping(struct drm_device *dev)
>>> -{
>>> -	if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev) && (dev->pdev->revision <
>>> -			ARRAY_SIZE(skl_stepping_info)))
>>> -		return skl_stepping_info[dev->pdev->revision].substepping;
>>> -	else if (IS_BROXTON(dev) && (dev->pdev->revision <
>>> -			ARRAY_SIZE(bxt_stepping_info)))
>>> -		return bxt_stepping_info[dev->pdev->revision].substepping;
>>> -	else
>>> -		return -ENODATA;
>>> +	if (INTEL_REVID(dev) < size)
>>> +		return si + INTEL_REVID(dev);
>>> +
>>> +	return NULL;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  /**
>>> @@ -296,8 +293,8 @@ static void finish_csr_load(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
>>>  	struct intel_package_header *package_header;
>>>  	struct intel_dmc_header *dmc_header;
>>>  	struct intel_csr *csr = &dev_priv->csr;
>>> -	char stepping = intel_get_stepping(dev);
>>> -	char substepping = intel_get_substepping(dev);
>>> +	const struct stepping_info *stepping_info = intel_get_stepping_info(dev);
>>> +	char stepping, substepping;
>>>  	uint32_t dmc_offset = CSR_DEFAULT_FW_OFFSET, readcount = 0, nbytes;
>>>  	uint32_t i;
>>>  	uint32_t *dmc_payload;
>>> @@ -308,11 +305,14 @@ static void finish_csr_load(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
>>>  		goto out;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> -	if ((stepping == -ENODATA) || (substepping == -ENODATA)) {
>>> +	if (!stepping_info) {
>>>  		DRM_ERROR("Unknown stepping info, firmware loading failed\n");
>>>  		goto out;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> +	stepping = stepping_info->stepping;
>>> +	substepping = stepping_info->substepping;
>>> +
>>>  	/* Extract CSS Header information*/
>>>  	css_header = (struct intel_css_header *)fw->data;
>>>  	if (sizeof(struct intel_css_header) !=
>>> -- 
>>> 2.1.4
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>>> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>>
>> -- 
>> Daniel Vetter
>> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
>> http://blog.ffwll.ch

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux