On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 01:52:48PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 03:18:30PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> > @@ -931,16 +930,20 @@ run_basic_modes(const struct access_mode *mode,
> > struct buffers buffers;
> >
> > for (h = hangs; h->suffix; h++) {
> > - if (!all && *h->suffix)
> > - continue;
> > + unsigned int subtest_flags;
> >
> > - for (p = all ? pipelines : pskip; p->prefix; p++) {
> > + if (*h->suffix)
> > + subtest_flags = SUBTEST_TYPE_SLOW;
>
> They aren't all slow though. The hang tests are (because it takes a long
> time for a hang to occur and we need to race many times for reasonable
> coverage). Many of the tests here were being skipped because QA couldn't
> handle the full set.
Of course. But unlike the creators of the tests in question I have very
little knowledge about why the tests in question weren't included in the
standard test set. Sorting tests into slow/cornercase/whatever is
something that should be done by people who properly know what
categories the bugs best belong to.
Kind regards, David
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
