Hey, Op 05-11-15 om 12:29 schreef Ville Syrjälä: > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 05:10:51PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> If FBC is disabled we will still call intel_fbc_invalidate(), and as a >> result we may call intel_fbc_deactivate(), which will try to touch >> registers. >> >> I'm pretty sure I saw this happen on a runtime suspended device, and > This is one of the BAT failures we have. I don't really understand why > we track the frontbuffer bits with FBC totally disabled, but this fix > seems simple enough on its own. Not sure if it applies without the > others, but if it doesn't I suggest trying to reorder the patchset so > we can put this in ASAP. > For the commit message what BAT is affected? ~Maarten _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
