Em Seg, 2015-11-02 às 11:48 +0000, Thomas Wood escreveu:
> Initialization was included in commit a976d7e (tests/kms_fbc_crc:
> refactor context
> handling code), but won't be executed since it is declared before the
> first
> label within a switch statement.
>
> kms_fbc_crc.c:178:2: warning: ‘context’ may be used uninitialized in
> this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> rendercopy(batch, context,
> ^
> kms_fbc_crc.c:271:22: note: ‘context’ was declared here
> drm_intel_context *context = NULL;
I don't see these warnings here. Which compiler do you use?
pzanoni@panetone:~/nfs/intel-gpu-tools/tests$ gcc --version
gcc (Debian 5.2.1-22) 5.2.1 20151010
The weird part is that it was initialized during the declaration, so
the declaration is valid yet the initialization is not? Anyway, your
change removes the ambiguity of the situation and avoid citations of
the C standard, so:
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> ^
> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Wood <thomas.wood@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tests/kms_fbc_crc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_fbc_crc.c b/tests/kms_fbc_crc.c
> index d580a94..02e95e5 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_fbc_crc.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_fbc_crc.c
> @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ static void test_crc(data_t *data, enum test_mode
> mode)
> {
> uint32_t crtc_id = data->output->config.crtc->crtc_id;
> uint32_t handle = data->fb[0].gem_handle;
> + drm_intel_context *context = NULL;
>
> igt_assert(fbc_enabled(data));
>
> @@ -268,7 +269,6 @@ static void test_crc(data_t *data, enum test_mode
> mode)
> }
>
> switch (mode) {
> - drm_intel_context *context = NULL;
> case TEST_PAGE_FLIP:
> break;
> case TEST_MMAP_CPU:
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
