On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:35:58PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > On ti, 2015-11-03 at 11:42 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Tue, 03 Nov 2015, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Just booted drm-next on a Skylake laptop that happened to be on my > > > desk for a few days. > > > > > > I wasn't impressed. I'm very disappointed. Doesn't anyone have any > > > pride in the code they write anymore. > > > > > > Initially the previous sentence had a lot of curse words and was Linus > > > like in it's stature, but I've been promised by twitter that being > > > nice will get me better results, so let's make it so. > > > > Much appreciated; we get the message. > > > > > So could someone from Intel takes some responsibility for testing the > > > code they send me actually you know works on the hardware it's meant > > > to, or at least tell me what is going so horribly wrong here. > > > > > > the lockdep trace at the end doesn't look fun. > > That's from the GuC firmware loader, so won't be fixed by the DMC > patches. Ville mentioned he has a fix for that. No, I don't. I probably just mentioned that I saw this lockdep spew already some weeks ago, and complained about it at the time. I think Daniel tried to ping someone specific about it, but no idea if they took any notice. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
