In passing, while reading the Intel DDX driver code, I've noticed
that the Intel driver contains code which assumes that the master and
render devices are related by minor device number, eg:
/* Are we a render-node ourselves? */
if (is_render_node(fd, &master))
return NULL;
sprintf(buf, "/dev/dri/renderD%d", (int)((master.st_rdev | 0x80) & 0xbf));
if (stat(buf, &render) == 0 &&
master.st_mode == render.st_mode &&
render.st_rdev == ((master.st_rdev | 0x80) & 0xbf))
return strdup(buf);
There's also code doing the reverse as well.
>From my observations, the assumption that this code is built upon is
false. I have an ARM platform here (non-Intel graphics) which shows
the problem - we have a KMS-only DRM driver (card0) and a GPU-only
DRM driver (card1). This populates the /dev/dri subdirectory as
follows:
crw-rw----+ 1 root video 226, 0 Oct 27 04:59 card0
crw-rw----+ 1 root video 226, 1 Oct 26 20:40 card1
crw-rw---- 1 root video 226, 64 Oct 26 20:40 controlD64
crw-rw---- 1 root video 226, 128 Oct 26 20:40 renderD128
and if I look at /sys/class/drm, you can then see who owns which devices:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Oct 26 20:40 card0 -> ../../devices/platform/armada-drm/drm/card0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Oct 26 20:40 card0-HDMI-A-1 -> ../../devices/platform/armada-drm/drm/card0/card0-HDMI-A-1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Oct 26 20:40 card1 -> ../../devices/platform/etnaviv/drm/card1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Oct 26 20:40 controlD64 -> ../../devices/platform/armada-drm/drm/controlD64
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Oct 26 20:40 renderD128 -> ../../devices/platform/etnaviv/drm/renderD128
So, renderD128 is card1's render node, which does not conform to the
assumption which the Intel DDX driver makes - (1 | 0x80) & 0xbf is
not 128. The same thing can happen if there's ever a case on Intel
hardware where a KMS DRM driver registers prior to the i915 driver.
I think the only way to properly determine which render nodes
correspond with which master node is to actually open the device and
check the device names, or parse sysfs - maybe reading the links of
/sys/class/drm, and checking which link dirname corresponds with the
master node.
Any comments?
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
