Re: [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] Unify slow/combinatorial test handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:58:45PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:42:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> > Until now we've had no unified way to handle slow/combinatorial tests.
> > Most of the time we don't want to run slow/combinatorial tests, so this
> > should remain the default, but when we do want to run such tests,
> > it has been handled differently in different tests.
> > 
> > This patch adds a --with-slow-combinatorial command line option to
> > igt_core, changes gem_concurrent_blit and kms_frontbuffer_tracking
> > to use this instead of their own methods, and removes gem_concurrent_all
> > in the process, since it's now unnecessary.
> 
> I'm not going to remember the --with-slow-combinatorial option. How
> about just --all, or --slow?

Yeah, --all as a shorthand sounds good to me.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux