On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:58:45PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 02:42:33PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote: > > Until now we've had no unified way to handle slow/combinatorial tests. > > Most of the time we don't want to run slow/combinatorial tests, so this > > should remain the default, but when we do want to run such tests, > > it has been handled differently in different tests. > > > > This patch adds a --with-slow-combinatorial command line option to > > igt_core, changes gem_concurrent_blit and kms_frontbuffer_tracking > > to use this instead of their own methods, and removes gem_concurrent_all > > in the process, since it's now unnecessary. > > I'm not going to remember the --with-slow-combinatorial option. How > about just --all, or --slow? Yeah, --all as a shorthand sounds good to me. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
