On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 01:54:58PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 08 Oct 2015, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 12:22:31PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > >> On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 11:43 +0300, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > >> > EDID detailed timings have a resolution of 10kHz for the pixel clock, so > >> > they can't represent certain CEA/HDMI modes accurately. If we see a mode > >> > coming in via detailed timings which otherwise matches one of the > >> > CEA/HDMI modes except the clock is just a bit off, let's assume that the > >> > intention was for that mode to be one of the CEA/HDMI modes and go ahead > >> > and fix up the clock to match the CEA/HDMI spec exactly (well, as close > >> > as we can get with the 1 kHz resolution we use). > >> > > >> > This should help code that's looking for an exact clock match (eg. i915 > >> > audio N/CTS setup). > >> > >> Looks like a sane set of changes. Series is: > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Merged the first two patches to drm-misc (the later one has conflicts with > > the lack of drm-intel-next, so can pull it in only after a rebase). > > This is needed in v4.3. Ok, after first dropping them I now reapplied them again for 4.4. Hopefully we're converging on this here now wrt maintainer fumbles ;-) Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
