From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Pass BIT(DRM_ROTATE_0) instead of DRM_ROTATE_0 to skl_update_scaler(). The former is a mask, the latter just the bit number. Fortunately the only thing skl_update_scaler() does with the rotation is check if it's 90/270 degrees or not, and so in this case it would still do the right thing. Cc: Chandra Konduru <chandra.konduru@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 7498c9d..02316d0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -4673,7 +4673,7 @@ int skl_update_scaler_crtc(struct intel_crtc_state *state) intel_crtc->base.base.id, intel_crtc->pipe, SKL_CRTC_INDEX); return skl_update_scaler(state, !state->base.active, SKL_CRTC_INDEX, - &state->scaler_state.scaler_id, DRM_ROTATE_0, + &state->scaler_state.scaler_id, BIT(DRM_ROTATE_0), state->pipe_src_w, state->pipe_src_h, adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay, adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay); } -- 2.4.9 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
