On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:52:57PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 02:43:21PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > > On 09/10/15 14:11, Chris Wilson wrote: > > >Since the remove of the pin-ioctl, we only care about not changing the > > >cache level on buffers pinned to the hardware as indicated by > > >obj->pin_display. By knowing that only objects pinned to the hardware > > >will have an elevated vma->pin_count, so we can coallesce many of the > > >linear walks over the obj->vma_list. > > > > > >v2: Try and retrospectively add comments explaining the steps in > > >rebinding the active VMA. > > > > > >Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Very nice! > > > > Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > > Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. Note you also want drm/i915: Move the mb() following release-mmap into release-mmap http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/61128/ to answer the question you posed in review. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
