On 13 October 2015 at 14:36, Sharma, Shashank <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/13/2015 6:33 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> On 10 October 2015 at 06:01, Sharma, Shashank <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/10/2015 3:51 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Shashank,
>>>>
>>>> On 9 October 2015 at 20:29, Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From DRM color management:
>>>>> ============================
>>>>> DRM color manager supports these color properties:
>>>>> 1. "ctm": Color transformation matrix property, where a
>>>>> color transformation matrix of 9 correction values gets
>>>>> applied as correction.
>>>>> 2. "palette_before_ctm": for corrections which get applied
>>>>> beore color transformation matrix correction.
>>>>> 3. "palette_after_ctm": for corrections which get applied
>>>>> after color transformation matrix correction.
>>>>>
>>>>> These color correction capabilities may differ per platform, supporting
>>>>> various different no. of correction coefficients. So DRM color manager
>>>>> support few properties using which a user space can query the
>>>>> platform's
>>>>> capability, and prepare color correction accordingly.
>>>>> These query properties are:
>>>>> 1. cm_coeff_after_ctm_property
>>>>> 2. cm_coeff_before_ctm_property
>>>>> (CTM is fix to 9 coefficients across industry)
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, Intel color manager registers:
>>>>> ======================================
>>>>> 1. Gamma correction property as "palette_after_ctm" property
>>>>> 2. Degamma correction capability as "palette_bafore_ctm" property
>>>>> capability as "palette_after_ctm" DRM color property hook.
>>>>> 3. CSC as "ctm" property.
>>>>>
>>>>> So finally, This patch does the following:
>>>>> 1. Add a function which loads the platform's color correction
>>>>> capabilities in the cm_crtc_palette_capabilities_property
>>>>> structure.
>>>>> 2. Attaches the cm_crtc_palette_capabilities_property to every CRTC
>>>>> getting initiaized.
>>>>> 3. Adds two new parameters "num_samples_after_ctm" and
>>>>> "num_samples_before_ctm" in intel_device_info as gamma and
>>>>> degamma coefficients vary per platform basis.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kausal Malladi <kausalmalladi@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c | 33
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>>>> index ad37b25..8bf1d6f 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
>>>>> @@ -798,6 +798,8 @@ struct intel_device_info {
>>>>> u8 num_sprites[I915_MAX_PIPES];
>>>>> u8 gen;
>>>>> u8 ring_mask; /* Rings supported by the HW */
>>>>> + u16 num_samples_after_ctm;
>>>>> + u16 num_samples_before_ctm;
>>>>> DEV_INFO_FOR_EACH_FLAG(DEFINE_FLAG, SEP_SEMICOLON);
>>>>> /* Register offsets for the various display pipes and
>>>>> transcoders */
>>>>> int pipe_offsets[I915_MAX_TRANSCODERS];
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c
>>>>> index 7357d99..e466748 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c
>>>>> @@ -28,6 +28,37 @@
>>>>> #include "intel_color_manager.h"
>>>>>
>>>>> void intel_attach_color_properties_to_crtc(struct drm_device *dev,
>>>>> - struct drm_mode_object *mode_obj)
>>>>> + struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>>>>> {
>>>>> + struct drm_mode_config *config = &dev->mode_config;
>>>>> + struct drm_mode_object *mode_obj = &crtc->base;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Register:
>>>>> + * =========
>>>>> + * Gamma correction as palette_after_ctm property
>>>>> + * Degamma correction as palette_before_ctm property
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Load:
>>>>> + * =====
>>>>> + * no. of coefficients supported on this platform for gamma
>>>>> + * and degamma with the query properties. A user
>>>>> + * space agent should read these query property, and prepare
>>>>> + * the color correction values accordingly. Its expected from
>>>>> the
>>>>> + * driver to load the right number of coefficients during the
>>>>> init
>>>>> + * phase.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if (config->cm_coeff_after_ctm_property) {
>>>>> + drm_object_attach_property(mode_obj,
>>>>> + config->cm_coeff_after_ctm_property,
>>>>> +
>>>>> INTEL_INFO(dev)->num_samples_after_ctm);
>>>>> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Gamma query property initialized\n");
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (config->cm_coeff_before_ctm_property) {
>>>>> + drm_object_attach_property(mode_obj,
>>>>> + config->cm_coeff_before_ctm_property,
>>>>> +
>>>>> INTEL_INFO(dev)->num_samples_before_ctm);
>>>>> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Degamma query property
>>>>> initialized\n");
>>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Shouldn't this commit be squashed with the previous ? You're also
>>>> missing the function declaration.
>>>>
>>> Please see the history of the review comments, initially this patch was
>>> like
>>> as you suggested. But one of the previous review comments, suggested to
>>> split that into two, as it was 'overdoing' stuff. So I had split it into
>>> two
>>> separate ones, so I think this is ok :)
>>>
>> Sorry did not see it. The revision history should be within the patch
>> either above or below the --- line.
>>
>>> So this is just the body of the
>>> function, and definition is coming up in next patch, where this function
>>> is
>>> being called from intel_crtc_init (patch 17/22 to be specific).
>>>
>> This is not how things work I'm afraid. The function declaration and
>> definition must _always_ be in the same patch.
>
> This is confusing, I have received previous comments which say the other
> way. But anyways, I can add the definition also in this patch, if you like
> that.
Do you have a link handy ? I suspect that something else was mentioned
in that comment as splitting function declaration and definition is
extremely uncommon.
Thanks
Emil
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
