Regards
Shashank
On 10/13/2015 7:15 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 10 October 2015 at 06:34, Sharma, Shashank <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/10/2015 5:24 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi Shashank,
On 9 October 2015 at 20:29, Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
BDW/SKL/BXT support Color Space Conversion (CSC) using a 3x3 matrix
that needs to be programmed into respective CSC registers.
This patch does the following:
1. Adds the core function to program CSC correction values for
BDW/SKL/BXT platform
2. Adds CSC correction macros/defines
Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kausal Malladi <kausalmalladi@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kumar, Kiran S <kiran.s.kumar@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 7 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c | 114
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.h | 12 ++-
3 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index ed50f75..0e9d252 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -8085,4 +8085,11 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
(_PIPE3(pipe, PAL_PREC_GCMAX_A, PAL_PREC_GCMAX_B,
PAL_PREC_GCMAX_C))
+/* BDW CSC correction */
+#define CSC_COEFF_A 0x49010
+#define CSC_COEFF_B 0x49110
+#define CSC_COEFF_C 0x49210
+#define _PIPE_CSC_COEFF(pipe) \
+ (_PIPE3(pipe, CSC_COEFF_A, CSC_COEFF_B, CSC_COEFF_C))
+
#endif /* _I915_REG_H_ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c
index e659382..0a6c00c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c
@@ -330,11 +330,119 @@ static int bdw_set_degamma(struct drm_device *dev,
return 0;
}
-static s16 chv_prepare_csc_coeff(s64 csc_value)
As mentioned previously, this should be part of the respective patch.
Agree. Looks like diff is messing up a bit. Will take care of this.
+static uint32_t bdw_prepare_csc_coeff(int64_t coeff)
+{
+ uint32_t reg_val, ls_bit_pos, exponent_bits, sign_bit = 0;
+ int32_t mantissa;
+ uint64_t abs_coeff;
+
+ coeff = min_t(int64_t, coeff, BDW_CSC_COEFF_MAX_VAL);
+ coeff = max_t(int64_t, coeff, BDW_CSC_COEFF_MIN_VAL);
+
+ abs_coeff = abs(coeff);
+ if (abs_coeff < (BDW_CSC_COEFF_UNITY_VAL >> 3)) {
+ /* abs_coeff < 0.125 */
+ exponent_bits = 3;
+ ls_bit_pos = 19;
+ } else if (abs_coeff >= (BDW_CSC_COEFF_UNITY_VAL >> 3) &&
+ abs_coeff < (BDW_CSC_COEFF_UNITY_VAL >> 2)) {
+ /* abs_coeff >= 0.125 && val < 0.25 */
+ exponent_bits = 2;
+ ls_bit_pos = 20;
+ } else if (abs_coeff >= (BDW_CSC_COEFF_UNITY_VAL >> 2)
+ && abs_coeff < (BDW_CSC_COEFF_UNITY_VAL >> 1)) {
+ /* abs_coeff >= 0.25 && val < 0.5 */
+ exponent_bits = 1;
+ ls_bit_pos = 21;
+ } else if (abs_coeff >= (BDW_CSC_COEFF_UNITY_VAL >> 1)
+ && abs_coeff < BDW_CSC_COEFF_UNITY_VAL) {
+ /* abs_coeff >= 0.5 && val < 1.0 */
+ exponent_bits = 0;
+ ls_bit_pos = 22;
+ } else if (abs_coeff >= BDW_CSC_COEFF_UNITY_VAL &&
+ abs_coeff < (BDW_CSC_COEFF_UNITY_VAL << 1)) {
+ /* abs_coeff >= 1.0 && val < 2.0 */
+ exponent_bits = 7;
+ ls_bit_pos = 23;
+ } else {
+ /* abs_coeff >= 2.0 && val < 4.0 */
+ exponent_bits = 6;
+ ls_bit_pos = 24;
+ }
+
+ mantissa = GET_BITS_ROUNDOFF(abs_coeff, ls_bit_pos,
CSC_MAX_VALS);
+ if (coeff < 0) {
+ sign_bit = 1;
+ mantissa = -mantissa;
+ mantissa &= ((1 << CSC_MAX_VALS) - 1);
I think there is a macro for this already ?
Thats for GAMMA_MAX, not for CSC_MAX. Or you mean the whole (1 <<
CSC_MAX_VALS -1) to be replaced with GET/SET bits ?
What I mean is - the above looks exactly like the GET_BIT_MASK (which
you introduced). Perhaps you can use it ?
Yes, Agree. but in later code review phase we realized that we dont even
need this masking for mantissa. New patch set doesnt have this &ing, so
we dont need this.
Regards,
Emil
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
