Re: [PATCH 19/22] drm/i915: BDW: Pipe level Gamma correction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Regards
Shashank

On 10/10/2015 5:09 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi Shashank,

On 9 October 2015 at 20:29, Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c
index d5315b2..74f8fc3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c
@@ -26,6 +26,252 @@
   */

  #include "intel_color_manager.h"
+static void bdw_write_10bit_gamma_precision(struct drm_device *dev,
+       struct drm_r32g32b32 *correction_values, u32 pal_prec_data,
+                       u32 no_of_coeff)
+{
+       u16 blue_fract, green_fract, red_fract;
+       u32 word = 0;
+       u32 count = 0;
+       u32 blue, green, red;
+       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+
+       while (count < no_of_coeff) {
Use for loop ? Here and through the rest of the patch.

Nah, I will prefer while().

[snip]
+void bdw_write_12bit_gamma_precision(struct drm_device *dev,
+       struct drm_r32g32b32 *correction_values, u32 pal_prec_data,
+               enum pipe pipe)
+{
Make the function static ?

Agree.
[snip]
+static int bdw_set_gamma(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_property_blob *blob,
+                       struct drm_crtc *crtc)
+{
+       u16 blue_fract, green_fract, red_fract;
+       enum pipe pipe;
+       int count, num_samples;
+       u32 blue, green, red;
+       u32 mode, pal_prec_index, pal_prec_data;
+       u32 index;
+       u32 word = 0;
+       struct drm_palette *gamma_data;
+       struct drm_crtc_state *state = crtc->state;
+       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+       struct drm_r32g32b32 *correction_values = NULL;
+
+       if (WARN_ON(!blob))
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       gamma_data = (struct drm_palette *)blob->data;
+       pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
+       num_samples = gamma_data->num_samples;
+
+       pal_prec_index = _PREC_PAL_INDEX(pipe);
+       pal_prec_data = _PREC_PAL_DATA(pipe);
+
+       correction_values = (struct drm_r32g32b32 *)&gamma_data->lut;
+       index = I915_READ(pal_prec_index);
+
+       switch (num_samples) {
+       case GAMMA_DISABLE_VALS:
+
+               /* Disable Gamma functionality on Pipe */
Drop the extra newline between the case and the comment ? Here and below.

I was trying to make it look good :(
[snip]
+       mode = I915_READ(GAMMA_MODE(pipe));
+       mode &= ~GAMMA_MODE_MODE_MASK;
+       I915_WRITE(GAMMA_MODE(pipe), mode | word);
+       DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Gamma applied on pipe %c\n",
+       pipe_name(pipe));
Indentation seems off here.

Agree.
Regards,
Emil

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux