On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 02:44:01PM +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote: > It's not an error for the workaround list to be empty if no > workarounds are needed. This will avoid spamming the logs > unnecessarily on Gen6 after the workaround list is hooked up on > pre-Gen8 hardware by the following commits. > > Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@xxxxxxxxxx> I think the idea of this was to not forget this when bringing up new platforms. I think we wrestle workarounds often enough to have a low risk for that ;-) Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > index 54ca344..3373516 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > @@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ static int intel_ring_workarounds_emit(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req) > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > struct i915_workarounds *w = &dev_priv->workarounds; > > - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(w->count == 0)) > + if (w->count == 0) > return 0; > > ring->gpu_caches_dirty = true; > -- > 2.5.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
