Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx> --- Paulo, I'm not positive that this is the cause of the issues you're seeing, but I did find this unwanted behavior change while re-reading all the SKL watermark code. Could you give this a try and see if it improves your situation at all? drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index 3857592..22c97f2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -2951,6 +2951,9 @@ skl_get_total_relative_data_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate) if (pstate->fb == NULL) continue; + if (intel_plane->base.type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR) + continue; + /* packed/uv */ total_data_rate += skl_plane_relative_data_rate(cstate, pstate, -- 2.1.4 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
