On Fri, 25 Sep 2015, Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dropping it because it is for pre-production stepping. Hum, why have we added a pre-pro w/a without a stepping check... should we backport this to stable kernels? What's the impact on production hardware with vs. without the w/a? BR, Jani. > > Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > index d8fa9d1..0b545cf 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > @@ -827,9 +827,6 @@ static int bdw_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *ring) > if (ret) > return ret; > > - /* WaDisableThreadStallDopClockGating:bdw (pre-production) */ > - WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN8_ROW_CHICKEN, STALL_DOP_GATING_DISABLE); > - > /* WaDisableDopClockGating:bdw */ > WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(GEN7_ROW_CHICKEN2, > DOP_CLOCK_GATING_DISABLE); > -- > 1.9.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
