>-----Original Message----- >From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 10:29 PM >To: Shankar, Uma >Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kumar, Shobhit >Subject: Re: [BXT MIPI PATCH v4 14/14] drm/i915: Added BXT DSI >backlight support > >On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 11:30:43PM +0530, Uma Shankar wrote: >> DSI backlight support for bxt is added. >> >> TODO: There is no support for backlight control in drm panel >> framework. This will be added as part of VBT version patches >> fixing the backlight sequence. >> >> v2: Fixed Jani's review comments from previous patch. Added the >> BXT DSI backlight code in this patch. Backlight setup and >> enable/disable code for backlight is added in intel_dsi.c. >> >> v3: Rebased on latest drm-nightly. Fixed Jani's review comments. >> >> v4: Making backlight calls generic as per Jani's suggestion. >> >> Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c >> index 08bade2..3e7f796 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c >> @@ -438,6 +438,7 @@ static void intel_dsi_enable(struct intel_encoder >*encoder) >> struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev; >> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; >> struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base); >> + struct intel_connector *intel_connector = >> +intel_dsi->attached_connector; >> enum port port; >> >> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n"); >> @@ -458,6 +459,9 @@ static void intel_dsi_enable(struct intel_encoder >> *encoder) >> >> intel_dsi_port_enable(encoder); >> } >> + >> + msleep(intel_dsi->backlight_on_delay); >> + intel_panel_enable_backlight(intel_connector); >> } >> >> static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder) @@ >> -623,10 +627,14 @@ static void intel_dsi_post_disable(struct >> intel_encoder *encoder) { >> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = encoder->base.dev->dev_private; >> struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base); >> + struct intel_connector *intel_connector = >> +intel_dsi->attached_connector; >> u32 val; >> >> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n"); >> >> + intel_panel_disable_backlight(intel_connector); >> + msleep(intel_dsi->backlight_off_delay); >> + >> intel_dsi_disable(encoder); >> >> intel_dsi_clear_device_ready(encoder); >> @@ -1226,8 +1234,18 @@ void intel_dsi_init(struct drm_device *dev) >> >> intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, fixed_mode, NULL); >> >> - return; >> + /* >> + * Pipe parameter is not used for BXT. >> + * Passing INVALID_PIPE to adher to API requirement. >> + */ >> + if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) >> + intel_panel_setup_backlight(connector, INVALID_PIPE); >> + else >> + intel_panel_setup_backlight(connector, >> + intel_encoder->crtc_mask == (1 << PIPE_A) ? >> + PIPE_A : PIPE_B); > >Is this aganst some ancient kernel version? We have backlight calls in the dsi >code already. > This support is added recently with Shobhit's "backlight control using CRC PMIC Based PWM driver" series. This seems to be merged last week. We can drop this patch, as it is already taken care in nightly branch. Regards, Uma Shankar >> + return; >> err: >> drm_encoder_cleanup(&intel_encoder->base); >> kfree(intel_dsi); >> -- >> 1.7.9.5 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Intel-gfx mailing list >> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > >-- >Ville Syrjälä >Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
