On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 02:28:41PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote: > Information on maximum supported pixel clock frequency to > i915_frequency_info. > > Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > index 6882455..b418d9b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > @@ -1311,6 +1311,7 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) > > seq_printf(m, "Current CD clock freq: %dkHz\n", dev_priv->cdclk_freq); > seq_printf(m, "Max CD clock freq: %dkHz\n", dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq); > + seq_printf(m, "Max pixel clock freq: %dkHz\n", dev_priv->max_dotclk_freq); I would put a space between the number and units. The rest of the stuff in there is about the gt stuff, so not sure if this is the best place for it. But if no one else objects, I won't either. Could probably squash all three patches into just one, since they're all doing the same thing anyway. With that these are: Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > out: > intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv); > -- > 1.9.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
