On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 09:43:06AM -0700, Yu Dai wrote: > Looks fine to me. > Reviewed by: Alex Dai <yu.dai@xxxxxxxxx>. > > On 08/23/2015 05:22 AM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote: > >On BXT, We Observe timeout for forcewake request completion with 2ms polling period as given here: > >[drm:fw_domains_get] ERROR render: timed out waiting for forcewake ack request. > >Polling for 50ms is recommended to avoid these timeouts. > > > >Change-Id: Ie715b0069a3049606e9602bc5e97a6511890864d > >Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx> Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel > >--- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c > >index 9d3c2e4..2df03b1 100644 > >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c > >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c > >@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ > > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > >-#define FORCEWAKE_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS 2 > >+#define FORCEWAKE_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS 50 > > #define __raw_i915_read8(dev_priv__, reg__) readb((dev_priv__)->regs + (reg__)) > > #define __raw_i915_write8(dev_priv__, reg__, val__) writeb(val__, (dev_priv__)->regs + (reg__)) > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx