>-----Original Message----- >From: Nikula, Jani >Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 7:08 PM >To: Shankar, Uma; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Cc: Kumar, Shobhit; Deak, Imre; Shankar, Uma >Subject: Re: [BXT MIPI PATCH v3 14/14] drm/i915: Added BXT DSI backlight >support > >On Tue, 01 Sep 2015, Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> DSI backlight support for bxt is added. >> >> TODO: There is no support for backlight control in drm panel >> framework. This will be added as part of VBT version patches >> fixing the backlight sequence. >> >> v2: Fixed Jani's review comments from previous patch. Added the >> BXT DSI backlight code in this patch. Backlight setup and >> enable/disable code for backlight is added in intel_dsi.c. >> >> v3: Rebased on latest drm-nightly. Fixed Jani's review comments. > >I'm not sure why these calls need to be within IS_BROXTON blocks. What >happens with the current backlight calls? Shouldn't we just have one set of calls? > >Also, I think we should get this [1] in first, and see how that affects things. > >BR, >Jani. > >[1] http://mid.gmane.org/cover.1442227790.git.jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx > The idea was not to disturb existing platforms and add support for BXT. We can hold this patch back and get the patch you mentioned merged, Accordingly if needed we can create a follow up patch to iron things out. Regards, Uma Shankar >> >> Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c >> index 08bade2..aee1539 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c >> @@ -438,6 +438,7 @@ static void intel_dsi_enable(struct intel_encoder >*encoder) >> struct drm_device *dev = encoder->base.dev; >> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; >> struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base); >> + struct intel_connector *intel_connector = >> +intel_dsi->attached_connector; >> enum port port; >> >> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n"); >> @@ -458,6 +459,11 @@ static void intel_dsi_enable(struct intel_encoder >> *encoder) >> >> intel_dsi_port_enable(encoder); >> } >> + >> + if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) { >> + msleep(intel_dsi->backlight_on_delay); >> + intel_panel_enable_backlight(intel_connector); >> + } >> } >> >> static void intel_dsi_pre_enable(struct intel_encoder *encoder) @@ >> -623,10 +629,16 @@ static void intel_dsi_post_disable(struct >> intel_encoder *encoder) { >> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = encoder->base.dev->dev_private; >> struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi = enc_to_intel_dsi(&encoder->base); >> + struct intel_connector *intel_connector = >> +intel_dsi->attached_connector; >> u32 val; >> >> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("\n"); >> >> + if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv->dev)) { >> + intel_panel_disable_backlight(intel_connector); >> + msleep(intel_dsi->backlight_off_delay); >> + } >> + >> intel_dsi_disable(encoder); >> >> intel_dsi_clear_device_ready(encoder); >> @@ -1226,8 +1238,14 @@ void intel_dsi_init(struct drm_device *dev) >> >> intel_panel_init(&intel_connector->panel, fixed_mode, NULL); >> >> - return; >> + /* >> + * Pipe parameter is not used for BXT. >> + * Passing INVALID_PIPE to adher to API requirement. >> + */ >> + if (IS_BROXTON(dev)) >> + intel_panel_setup_backlight(connector, INVALID_PIPE); >> >> + return; >> err: >> drm_encoder_cleanup(&intel_encoder->base); >> kfree(intel_dsi); >> -- >> 1.7.9.5 >> > >-- >Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
