On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, Deepak M <m.deepak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: vkorjani <vikas.korjani@xxxxxxxxx> > > New sequence element for i2c is been added in the > mipi sequence block of the VBT. This patch parses > and executes the i2c sequence. > > v2: Add i2c_put_adapter call(Jani), rebase > > Signed-off-by: vkorjani <vikas.korjani@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Deepak M <m.deepak@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 6 +++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.h | 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 68 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > index c8acc29..0bf0942 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c > @@ -714,6 +714,12 @@ static u8 *goto_next_sequence(u8 *data, int *size) > > data += 3; > break; > + case MIPI_SEQ_ELEM_I2C: > + /* skip by this element payload size */ > + data += 7; > + len = *data; > + data += len + 1; > + break; > default: > DRM_ERROR("Unknown element\n"); > return NULL; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.h > index 1b7417e..21a7f3f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.h > @@ -956,6 +956,7 @@ enum mipi_seq_element { > MIPI_SEQ_ELEM_SEND_PKT, > MIPI_SEQ_ELEM_DELAY, > MIPI_SEQ_ELEM_GPIO, > + MIPI_SEQ_ELEM_I2C, > MIPI_SEQ_ELEM_STATUS, Side note, MIPI_SEQ_ELEM_STATUS doesn't seem to be in spec. > MIPI_SEQ_ELEM_MAX > }; > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c > index a5e99ac..9989f61 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi_panel_vbt.c > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ > #include <drm/drm_panel.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <video/mipi_display.h> > +#include <linux/i2c.h> > #include <asm/intel-mid.h> > #include <video/mipi_display.h> > #include "i915_drv.h" > @@ -104,6 +105,65 @@ static struct gpio_table gtable[] = { > { GPIO_NC_11_PCONF0, GPIO_NC_11_PAD, 0} > }; > > +static const u8 *mipi_exec_i2c(struct intel_dsi *intel_dsi, const u8 *data) > +{ > + struct i2c_adapter *adapter; > + int ret; > + u8 reg_offset, payload_size, retries = 5; > + struct i2c_msg msg; > + u8 *transmit_buffer = NULL; > + u8 flag = *data++; > + u8 index = *data++; > + u8 bus_number = *data++; > + u16 slave_add = *(u16 *)(data); > + > + data = data + 2; > + reg_offset = *data++; > + payload_size = *data++; > + > + adapter = i2c_get_adapter(bus_number); > + > + if (!adapter) { > + DRM_ERROR("i2c_get_adapter(%u) failed, index:%u flag: %u\n", > + (bus_number + 1), index, flag); Why do you log bus_number + 1 instead of what was actually tried? I don't see why the flag/index are useful for in the message, as they're not relevant to the i2c_get_adapter failing. > + goto out; > + } > + > + transmit_buffer = kmalloc(1 + payload_size, GFP_TEMPORARY); > + > + if (!transmit_buffer) > + goto out; > + > + transmit_buffer[0] = reg_offset; > + memcpy(&transmit_buffer[1], data, (size_t)payload_size); Why do you need the cast? > + > + msg.addr = slave_add; > + msg.flags = 0; > + msg.len = payload_size + 1; > + msg.buf = &transmit_buffer[0]; > + > + do { > + ret = i2c_transfer(adapter, &msg, 1); > + if (ret == 1) > + break; > + else if (ret == -EAGAIN) > + usleep_range(1000, 2500); > + else { > + DRM_ERROR("i2c transfer failed, error code:%d", ret); \n missing. > + break; > + } > + } while (retries--); > + > + if (retries == 0) Due to the way you post-decrement retries, you may end up here even if the transfer succeeds on the last try. You may also end up printing two error messages, if i2c_transfer fails on the last try. > + DRM_ERROR("i2c transfer failed, error code:%d", ret); \n missing. > +out: > + kfree(transmit_buffer); > + i2c_put_adapter(adapter); > + > + data = data + payload_size; > + return data; > +} > + > static inline enum port intel_dsi_seq_port_to_port(u8 port) > { > return port ? PORT_C : PORT_A; > @@ -236,6 +296,7 @@ static const fn_mipi_elem_exec exec_elem[] = { > mipi_exec_send_packet, > mipi_exec_delay, > mipi_exec_gpio, > + mipi_exec_i2c, > NULL, /* status read; later */ > }; > > -- > 1.7.9.5 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx