On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:40 AM Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Using intel_encoder's hpd_pin to check the live status
because of BXT A0/A1 WA for HPD pins and hpd_pin contains the
updated pin for the corresponding port.
It makes sense, but is it always true? or we should have a fallback to intel_dig_port->port in some case or in some stepping after A0/A1?
With this clarified feel free to use:
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 796f930..bf17030 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -4663,11 +4663,14 @@ static bool vlv_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
}
static bool bxt_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
- struct intel_digital_port *port)
+ struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port)
{
+ struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
+ enum port port;
u32 bit;
- switch (port->port) {
+ intel_hpd_pin_to_port(intel_encoder->hpd_pin, &port);
+ switch (port) {
case PORT_A:
bit = BXT_DE_PORT_HP_DDIA;
break;
@@ -4678,7 +4681,7 @@ static bool bxt_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
bit = BXT_DE_PORT_HP_DDIC;
break;
default:
- MISSING_CASE(port->port);
+ MISSING_CASE(port);
return false;
}
--
1.7.10.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
