Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Notify Coarse Power Gating changes to GuC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 09/10/2015 11:16 PM, Kamble, Sagar A wrote:
Hi Alex,

Kindly incorporate changes in this patch in your patch at:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-September/075668.html
- [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/guc: Media domain bit needed when notify GuC rc6
state

This is because GuC sample forcewake parameters depend on Coarse power
gating configuration.

Thanks
Sagar



On 8/28/2015 1:25 AM, O'Rourke, Tom wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 05:52:51PM +0530, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
>> From: Alex Dai <yu.dai@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
> [TOR:] This commit message is inadequate.  The
> needed information is in the cover letter but
> is lacking here.  Please rebase with Alex's
> previous patch "drm/i915: Notify GuC rc6 state"
>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Dai <yu.dai@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h           |  1 +
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c            | 16 ++++++++++++----
>>   3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
>> index ec70393..462c679 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
>> @@ -877,6 +877,24 @@ int i915_guc_submission_enable(struct drm_device *dev)
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> +void i915_guc_sample_forcewake(struct drm_device *dev, u32 fw_data)
>> +{
>> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> +	struct intel_guc *guc = &dev_priv->guc;
>> +	struct intel_guc_fw *guc_fw = &dev_priv->guc.guc_fw;
>> +
>> +	/* Notify GuC about CPG changes. */
>> +	if (guc_fw->guc_fw_fetch_status == GUC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS) {

This might not be safe to protect code below. In the case of suspend, the guc_fw_fetch_status and guc_fw_load_status both are SUCCESS. However, we need to reload fw before any host2guc calls.

>> +		u32 data[2];
>> +
>> +		data[0] = HOST2GUC_ACTION_SAMPLE_FORCEWAKE;
>> +		data[1] = fw_data;
>> +
>> +		if (host2guc_action(guc, data, 2))
>> +			DRM_ERROR("Unable to notify GuC of CPG change\n");
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +

Please call host2guc_sample_forcewake rather than a host2guc_action.

>>   void i915_guc_submission_disable(struct drm_device *dev)
>>   {
>>   	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
>> index 4ec2d27..691574d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.h
>> @@ -118,5 +118,6 @@ int i915_guc_submit(struct i915_guc_client *client,
>>   		    struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq);
>>   void i915_guc_submission_disable(struct drm_device *dev);
>>   void i915_guc_submission_fini(struct drm_device *dev);
>> +void i915_guc_sample_forcewake(struct drm_device *dev, u32 fw_data);
>>
>>   #endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> index c0345d2..4a0483c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> @@ -4616,6 +4616,9 @@ static void gen9_disable_rps(struct drm_device *dev)
>>   	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>>
>>   	I915_WRITE(GEN6_RC_CONTROL, 0);
>> +
>> +	i915_guc_sample_forcewake(dev, 0);
>> +
>>   	I915_WRITE(GEN9_PG_ENABLE, 0);
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -4804,6 +4807,7 @@ static void gen9_enable_rc6(struct drm_device *dev)
>>   	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
>>   	struct intel_engine_cs *ring;
>>   	uint32_t rc6_mask = 0;
>> +	uint32_t cpg_data = 0;
>>   	int unused;
>>
>>   	/* 1a: Software RC state - RC0 */
>> @@ -4843,11 +4847,15 @@ static void gen9_enable_rc6(struct drm_device *dev)
>>   	 * WaRsDisableCoarsePowerGating:skl,bxt - Render/Media PG need to be disabled with RC6.
>>   	 */
>>   	if ((IS_BROXTON(dev) && (INTEL_REVID(dev) < BXT_REVID_B0)) ||
>> -		(IS_SKYLAKE(dev) && (INTEL_REVID(dev) <= SKL_REVID_E0)))
>> +		(IS_SKYLAKE(dev) && (INTEL_REVID(dev) <= SKL_REVID_E0))) {
>> +		i915_guc_sample_forcewake(dev, 0);
>>   		I915_WRITE(GEN9_PG_ENABLE, 0);
>> -	else
>> -		I915_WRITE(GEN9_PG_ENABLE, (rc6_mask & GEN6_RC_CTL_RC6_ENABLE) ?
>> -				(GEN9_RENDER_PG_ENABLE | GEN9_MEDIA_PG_ENABLE) : 0);
>> +	} else {
>> +		cpg_data = (rc6_mask & GEN6_RC_CTL_RC6_ENABLE)?
>> +				(GEN9_RENDER_PG_ENABLE | GEN9_MEDIA_PG_ENABLE):0;
>> +		i915_guc_sample_forcewake(dev, cpg_data);
>> +		I915_WRITE(GEN9_PG_ENABLE, cpg_data);
>> +	}
>>
>>   	intel_uncore_forcewake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
>>
>> --

Be note that calling guc function here actually happens in another thread. The host2guc action will fail if GuC is not loaded. So there is a potential racing issue here. I believe the failure will happen during suspend / resume. I believe calling i915_guc_sample_forcewake or host2guc_sample_forcewake after GuC is initialized is good enough.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux