On 04/09/2015 12:59, Michel Thierry wrote:
Also check for correct revision id in each Gen9 platform (SKL until B0
and BXT until A0).
Cc: Nick Hoath <nicholas.hoath@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 28a712e..d8b605f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -301,10 +301,10 @@ uint64_t intel_lr_context_descriptor(struct intel_context *ctx,
/* desc |= GEN8_CTX_FORCE_RESTORE; */
/* WaEnableForceRestoreInCtxtDescForVCS:skl */
- if (IS_GEN9(dev) &&
- INTEL_REVID(dev) <= SKL_REVID_B0 &&
- (ring->id == BCS || ring->id == VCS ||
- ring->id == VECS || ring->id == VCS2))
+ /* WaEnableForceRestoreInCtxtDescForVCS:bxt */
+ if (((IS_SKYLAKE(dev) && INTEL_REVID(dev) <= SKL_REVID_B0) ||
+ (IS_BROXTON(dev) && INTEL_REVID(dev) == BXT_REVID_A0)) &&
+ (ring->id == VCS || ring->id == VCS2))
desc |= GEN8_CTX_FORCE_RESTORE;
return desc;
Maybe we can drop SKL as they are early revisions? even if we choose to
retain it looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
regards
Arun
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
