On 9 September 2015 at 09:46, <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx> > > The test expects an ioctl failure when it tries to set > CONTEXT_PARAM_NO_ZEROMAP from a non-root process. However, there is no > requirement in the kernel for the user to be root to set this parameter, > so the test is failing (it never passed as far as I'm aware of). > Fix the test by making it expect a successful ioctl completion. David, is this what you would expect? > > Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c b/tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c > index ac5f038..4741821 100644 > --- a/tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c > +++ b/tests/gem_ctx_param_basic.c > @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ igt_main > ctx_param.context = ctx; > TEST_SUCCESS(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_GETPARAM); > ctx_param.value--; > - TEST_FAIL(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_SETPARAM, EPERM); > + TEST_SUCCESS(LOCAL_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CONTEXT_SETPARAM); > } > > igt_waitchildren(); > -- > 1.9.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
