On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 02:55:34PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 09:30:18AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 06:34:18PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > > The spec says we just can't use it. > > > > But what about when we inherit a framebuffer at that address? > > Indeed. I asked the same question several times during the past attempts > at this, and even tried to outline a potential solution at least once [1] Paulo's only patching the insert_node_in_range allocator, for fbcon takeover we use reserve_node. I think this patch seems to do what you want it to do, no need for fancier schemes. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
