On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:41:45AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 14:31 +0300, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote: > >> On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 18:28 +0300, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira wrote: > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > I've been looking into creating custom fields in Bugzilla to help sort > >> > our bugs in a more manageable way. > >> > >> [...] > >> > >> > So I would like to hear what other people think about this. Specially, > >> > about what should be in the features field. The values can change > >> > overtime, but would be good to have a good list from the start. > >> > >> So here's the list after including Daniel's and Ville's feedback. If > >> there's no more suggestions/objections, I'd like to create those fields > >> already tomorrow. We can edit the list entries afterwards if needed. > > > > Thank you, everyone, for the input. The fields are now created. > > There are some additional feature fields that I've found might be > useful: > > display/adapter (or display/dongle?) display/DP? > display/hotplug tag it with relevant output port? > display/multi-gpu > GEM/prime (or GEM/dma-buf?) Yeah this might be useful, but not sure how much we care. > other/IOMMU (or GEM/IOMMU?) > other/BIOS Imo better to label with relevant feature that gets broken. And IOMMU should always have dwmw on cc so he can escalate. > other/module-reload (?) This is BAT now and should never break ;-) > performance? Yeah this would be good I guess. In general I'm vary of adding too many since it'll be hard to maintain. Can you please join the bug scrub org mtg on Thu so we can discuss these? Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
