The ENODEV return value was introduced to the GEM_SET_CACHING ioctl to mean that the given platform doesn't support the requested caching level (currently only due to a HW issues on BXT A steppings). Handle this as the other cases where we want to skip the related subtests. Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> --- lib/ioctl_wrappers.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c b/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c index 53bd635..25f0b2c 100644 --- a/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c +++ b/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c @@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ void gem_set_caching(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint32_t caching) arg.caching = caching; ret = ioctl(fd, LOCAL_DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_SET_CACHEING, &arg); - igt_assert(ret == 0 || (errno == ENOTTY || errno == EINVAL)); + igt_assert(ret == 0 || (errno == ENOTTY || errno == EINVAL || + errno == ENODEV)); igt_require(ret == 0); errno = 0; } -- 2.1.4 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
