On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 15:43 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 04:42:53PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 04:49:33PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote: > > >> Depending on the VBT BDB version the maximum size > > >> can be up to 38 bytes. > > >> > > >> This fix increases the maximum of the VBT expected size > > >> from 33 bytes to 38 bytes and by doing so cures the kernel > > >> hang on BSW box. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > We already have David's patch in -fixes, how does this relate? How does it > > > blow up? Is this a regression? If so which commit created it? Where's the > > > bugzilla link from QA? > > > > There's no bugzilla link from QA because Mika found the bug and I told > > him to just send the patch. > > so bsw doesn't boot and QA didn't notice? That's fail too, just different > kind of fail ... > -Daniel Well, there is now a bug report now which can be found https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91613 In addition, David refined his patch series, which relates to this issue and therefore my bugfix can be ignored. https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/56911/ -Mika- _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
