On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 03:13:57PM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote:
> It is possible the we request to have a mode that has
> higher pixel clock than our HW can support. This patch
> checks if requested pixel clock is lower than the one
> supported by the HW. The requested mode is discarded
> if we cannot support the requested pixel clock.
>
> This patch applies to TV.
>
> V2:
> - removed computation for max pixel clock
>
> V3:
> - cleanup by removing unnecessary lines
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c
> index 8b9d325..beeed25 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_tv.c
> @@ -897,6 +897,10 @@ intel_tv_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
> {
> struct intel_tv *intel_tv = intel_attached_tv(connector);
> const struct tv_mode *tv_mode = intel_tv_mode_find(intel_tv);
> + int max_pixclk = to_i915(connector->dev)->max_dotclk;
> +
> + if (mode->clock > max_pixclk)
> + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
The mode handling in intel_tv.c seems to be a mess. But I suppose this
should be OK.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> /* Ensure TV refresh is close to desired refresh */
> if (tv_mode && abs(tv_mode->refresh - drm_mode_vrefresh(mode) * 1000)
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
