Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] drm/i915/gen9: Disable gather at set shader bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/08/15 15:44, Arun Siluvery wrote:
 From Gen9, Push constant instruction parsing behaviour varies according to
whether set shader is enabled or not. If we want legacy behaviour then it
can be achieved by disabling set shader.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89959

Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h         |  5 +++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 10 ++++++++++
  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

[snip]

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index cf61262..7d284ed 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -983,6 +983,16 @@ static int gen9_init_workarounds(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
  		tmp |= HDC_FORCE_CSR_NON_COHERENT_OVR_DISABLE;
  	WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(HDC_CHICKEN0, tmp);

+	/* Chicken bits to disable set shader is in multiple places,
+	 * set bits in all required registers to disable it correctly
+	 */
+	WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(COMMON_SLICE_CHICKEN2, GEN9_DISABLE_GATHER_SET_SHADER_SLICE);
+	if ((IS_SKYLAKE(dev) && INTEL_REVID(dev) <= SKL_REVID_D0) ||
+	    (IS_BROXTON(dev) && INTEL_REVID(dev) == BXT_REVID_A0))
+		WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(RS_CHICKEN, RS_CHICKEN_DISABLE_GATHER_AT_SHADER);
+	else
+		WA_SET_BIT_MASKED(CS_RCS_BE, CS_RCS_DISABLE_GATHER_AT_SHADER);
+
  	return 0;
  }

This workaround isn't tagged with a specific /* WaXyz:chip */ comment.
Also, the style isn't consistent with the other paragraphs earlier in this function: those have braces round the body part even when there's only one line of code, possibly to make it clear where the WA comment applies (of course, this is why the buggy WA_REG() macro wasn't spotted earlier).

So, maybe prettify this a bit, if possible? The code actually looks correct, just ugly.

Oh, and keep patch 1 even if you decide to abandon this one!

.Dave.

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux