On 8/5/2015 9:59 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 04:55:52PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
VBT version 196 increased the size of common_child_dev_config. The parser
code assumed that the size of this structure would not change.
The modified code now copies the amount needed based on the VBT version,
and emits a debug message if the VBT version is unknown (too new);
since the struct config block won't shrink in newer versions it should
be harmless to copy the maximum known size in such cases, so that's
what we do, but emitting the warning is probably sensible anyway.
In the longer run it might make sense to modify the parser code to
use a version/feature mapping, rather than hardcoding things like this,
but for now the variants are fairly managable.
v2: Stricter size checks
Signed-off-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Since Chris mentioned that this should fix a regression I applied it to
drm-intel-fixes.
-Daniel
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
index 2ff9eb00fdec..8a1f3e1fc598 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
@@ -1015,15 +1015,33 @@ parse_device_mapping(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
const union child_device_config *p_child;
union child_device_config *child_dev_ptr;
int i, child_device_num, count;
- u16 block_size;
+ u8 expected_size;
+ u16 block_size;
p_defs = find_section(bdb, BDB_GENERAL_DEFINITIONS);
if (!p_defs) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No general definition block is found, no devices defined.\n");
return;
}
- if (p_defs->child_dev_size < sizeof(*p_child)) {
- DRM_ERROR("General definiton block child device size is too small.\n");
+ if (bdb->version < 195) {
+ expected_size = 33;
+ } else if (bdb->version == 195) {
+ expected_size = 37;
+ } else if (bdb->version <= 197) {
+ expected_size = 38;
+ } else {
+ expected_size = 38;
+ DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Expected child_device_config size for BDB version %u not known; assuming %u\n", expected_size);
Hi, the line above throws a warning because there are two '%u' but only
one variable. Looks like bdb->version should be the 1st printed value.
+ }
+
+ if (expected_size > sizeof(*p_child)) {
+ DRM_ERROR("child_device_config cannot fit in p_child\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (p_defs->child_dev_size != expected_size) {
+ DRM_ERROR("Size mismatch; child_device_config size=%u (expected %u); bdb->version: %u\n",
+ p_defs->child_dev_size, expected_size, bdb->version);
return;
}
/* get the block size of general definitions */
@@ -1070,7 +1088,7 @@ parse_device_mapping(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
child_dev_ptr = dev_priv->vbt.child_dev + count;
count++;
- memcpy(child_dev_ptr, p_child, sizeof(*p_child));
+ memcpy(child_dev_ptr, p_child, p_defs->child_dev_size);
}
return;
}
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
