On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:15:27AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Older VBT (e.g. gen2) have smaller child block defintions, so do not cry
> wolf over an error that is outside of our control and is not an error
> anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> index 2ff9eb00fdec..f8afbafa8e02 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_bios.c
> @@ -1023,7 +1023,7 @@ parse_device_mapping(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> return;
> }
> if (p_defs->child_dev_size < sizeof(*p_child)) {
This line was added in
commit 90e4f1592bb6e82f6690f0e05a8aadcf04d7bce7
Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Mar 25 18:45:58 2015 +0200
drm/i915: Fix the VBT child device parsing for BSW
Since vbt is complete pain I started requiring that we match expected
sizes with vbt versions. Can some one please fix this?
Or we can just revert the old patch.
-Daniel
> - DRM_ERROR("General definiton block child device size is too small.\n");
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("General definiton block child device size is too small.\n");
> return;
> }
> /* get the block size of general definitions */
> --
> 2.5.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
