On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 10:23:19 +0200 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm wondering if we need a kernel summit session on commenting > > conventions, markdown-in-kerneldoc, etc? Maybe I'll stick a proposal out > > there. > > Might be useful, but I'm not sure how many people really would actively > work on improving the tooling. The only comment I've seen is to maybe use > gtkdoc, but that would be a pain since it's slightly incompatible with > kerneldoc. The idea was to get a sense for what sort of improvements would be useful, to begin with. But my attempt to start a discussion on the kernel summit list appears to have hit the ground pretty hard; I guess that means I have free rein :) I expect I'll apply the struct-args doc patch in the fairly near future. Then we'll see if others complain when patches using it start to show up, but the feature itself shouldn't break anything. I'm *really* hoping to take a hard look at Danilo's stuff for a 4.3 merge as well. It should be possible, but there's real-world obnoxiousness that is doing its best to get in the way. jon _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
