Hi Jon, On Saturday 01 August 2015 13:22:10 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:06:45 -0300 Danilo Cesar Lemes de Paula wrote: > > Describing arguments at top of a struct definition works fine > > for small/medium size structs, but it definitely doesn't work well > > for struct with a huge list of elements. > > > > Keeping the arguments list inside the struct body makes it easier > > to maintain the documentation. > > Interesting approach. I think it could make sense, but I fear pushback > from a subset of maintainers refusing to accept this mode. I wonder what > it would take to get a consensus on allowing these in-struct comments? > > I'm wondering if we need a kernel summit session on commenting > conventions, markdown-in-kerneldoc, etc? Maybe I'll stick a proposal out > there. The topic of documentation has been raised in the mail thread of the kernel recruitment proposal for the kernel summit. I believe it's an important one, and I will be very interested in contributing if it is discussed as a separate topic. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
