Op 29-07-15 om 15:26 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira: > On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 14:35 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> Now that everything's atomic, checking encoder->base.crtc is enough. > Don't you need to check encoder->base.crtc->state->active too? Not sure, I think stealing a encoder being bound to any crtc is probably good enough reason to warn. We probably don't hold the right lock to dereference crtc->state. ~Maarten _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
