On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 08:36:18PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:14:19AM -0700, Hanno Böck wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:14:51 +0200 > > Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Indeed, nice catch. Could you please read > > > > Documentation/SubmittingPatches and apply your Signed-off-by and > > > > then we can accept this patch under your authorship. > > > > > > > > Preferrably this is two patches, (a) fix the tables, (b) fix the > > > > validator. That way we can delay enabling the validator if we need > > > > to fix the tables for others. > > > > I think I have checked all tables, not just the ones used on my gpu, > > they should be fine. But I've splittet the patch. > > > > > Also can you please add signed-off-by lines to your patch when > > > resubmitting? See Documentation/SubmittingPatches for all the details. > > > > The patch already had a "Signed-off-by" line. > > > > The checkpatch script complains that it doesn't like the formatting of > > the CMD command. However I won't change that in this patch, as this is > > how the whole file is formatted. If this is wanted I can submit a patch > > changing the formatting afterwards, but I think this is an unrelated > > change. > > > > Please apply. > > > > -- > > Hanno Böck > > http://hboeck.de/ > > > > mail/jabber: hanno@xxxxxxxxx > > GPG: BBB51E42 > > > Properly sort cmd tables. > > drm/i915: Properly sort MI coomand table > > In the future, we may want to speed up command/register searching using > a bisection and so we require them to be in ascending order respectively > by command value or register address. However, this was not true for one > pair in the MI table; make it so. > > > Signed-off-by: Hanno Boeck <hanno@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c > > index 306d9e4..5fdd8c8 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c > > @@ -151,8 +151,8 @@ static const struct drm_i915_cmd_descriptor render_cmds[] = { > > CMD( MI_ARB_ON_OFF, SMI, F, 1, R ), > > CMD( MI_PREDICATE, SMI, F, 1, S ), > > CMD( MI_TOPOLOGY_FILTER, SMI, F, 1, S ), > > - CMD( MI_DISPLAY_FLIP, SMI, !F, 0xFF, R ), > > CMD( MI_SET_APPID, SMI, F, 1, S ), > > + CMD( MI_DISPLAY_FLIP, SMI, !F, 0xFF, R ), > > CMD( MI_SET_CONTEXT, SMI, !F, 0xFF, R ), > > CMD( MI_URB_CLEAR, SMI, !F, 0xFF, S ), > > CMD( MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM, SMI, !F, 0x3F, B, > > > Fix loop checking cmd tables. > > drm/i915: Fix command parser table validator > > As we may like to use a bisection search on the tables in future, we > need them to be ordered. For convenience we expect the compiled tables > to be order and check on initialisation. However, the validator used the > wrong iterators failed to spot the misordered MI tables and instead > walked off into the unknown (as spotted by kasan). > > > Signed-off-by: Hanno Boeck <hanno@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Ok I hand-assembled the patches since it's your first, but please followo Documentation/Submitting patches next time around, i.e. 1 mail per patch, no attachments, diff included at the bottom. Otherwise the tools can't just pick up patches on my side. git send-email will do all that formatting for you correctly, so that's what I recommend to use. Anyway pachtes applied to drm-intel-next-queued, thanks a lot for doing them. -Daniel > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c > > index 306d9e4..3a53bf3 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_cmd_parser.c > > @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static bool validate_cmds_sorted(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, > > > > for (j = 0; j < table->count; j++) { > > const struct drm_i915_cmd_descriptor *desc = > > - &table->table[i]; > > + &table->table[j]; > > u32 curr = desc->cmd.value & desc->cmd.mask; > > > > if (curr < previous) { > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx