On 21.07.2015 11:43, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:07:20AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:58:50AM +0200, Krzysztof Kolasa wrote: >>> On 21.07.2015 10:41, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>>> I meant whether you can reset the bad commit and it's immediate parent >>>> extensively to make sure the bisect is really correct. gpu's occasionally >>>> take a while to hang themselves, so could be that the bisect was >>>> mislead somewhere. >>> >>> Again I will bisect, more testing good sections. >>> >>> At the moment on my old laptop, the latest official, properly working kernel is 4.1.2 >> You don't need to redo the full bisect, only retest the bad and the parent >> of the bad extensively. That's enough to confirm the bisect result for >> sure. > The bisection is misleading. It's a missing write-barrier. > -Chris > tested again: # good: [cd102a687beed1042824d5fa81c6ba8bfe78e6a4] drm/i915: Remove misleading comment around bind_to_vm git bisect good cd102a687beed1042824d5fa81c6ba8bfe78e6a4 # bad: [0875546c5318c85c13d07014af5350e9000bc9e9] drm/i915: Fix up the vma aliasing ppgtt binding git bisect bad 0875546c5318c85c13d07014af5350e9000bc9e9 # first bad commit: [0875546c5318c85c13d07014af5350e9000bc9e9] drm/i915: Fix up the vma aliasing ppgtt binding Screen does not lie :) first bad is BAD, good is GOOD on commit cd102a687beed10, computer worked steadily (with a large number of windows, applications) about an hour and stopped the tests, everything was OK on commit 0875546c5318c85, after about one minute, the screen gone mad Krzysztof _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx