It really doesn't protect anything which doesn't have other locks
already. Also this is run from driver unload code so not much need for
locks anyway.
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
index 318165d4855c..3aefcb25d953 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
@@ -420,7 +420,6 @@ void radeon_bo_force_delete(struct radeon_device *rdev)
}
dev_err(rdev->dev, "Userspace still has active objects !\n");
list_for_each_entry_safe(bo, n, &rdev->gem.objects, list) {
- mutex_lock(&rdev->ddev->struct_mutex);
dev_err(rdev->dev, "%p %p %lu %lu force free\n",
&bo->gem_base, bo, (unsigned long)bo->gem_base.size,
*((unsigned long *)&bo->gem_base.refcount));
@@ -428,8 +427,7 @@ void radeon_bo_force_delete(struct radeon_device *rdev)
list_del_init(&bo->list);
mutex_unlock(&bo->rdev->gem.mutex);
/* this should unref the ttm bo */
- drm_gem_object_unreference(&bo->gem_base);
- mutex_unlock(&rdev->ddev->struct_mutex);
+ drm_gem_object_unreference_unlocked(&bo->gem_base);
}
}
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
