On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 10:10 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2015-07-08 20:24 GMT-03:00 Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>: > > fbdev_set_par is called when fbcon is taking over control. > > In the past frontbuffer was being invalidated on > > set_to_gtt_domain, but it moved to set_domain fixing that case, > > but left this behind. > > > > Commit that changed this fixing set_domain case was: > > > > commit 031b698a77a70a6c394568034437b5486a44e868 > > Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > > Date: Fri Jun 26 19:35:16 2015 +0200 > > > > drm/i915: Unconditionally do fb tracking invalidate in set_domain > > > > Since we are also invalidating in other fbdev cases this one > > was masked here. At least until now that I found this corner > > case: On boot with plymouth doing a splash screen > > when returning to the console frontbuffer wans't being invalidated > > causing missed screen updates with PSR enabled. > > > > So this patch fixes this issue. > > > > v2: Make invalidate directly and unconditionally and > > fix commit message indicating the set_domain fix > > as pointed out by Daniel. > > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c > > index 2a1724e..44c9ccc 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c > > @@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ static int intel_fbdev_set_par(struct fb_info *info) > > * now until we solve this for real. > > */ > > mutex_lock(&fb_helper->dev->struct_mutex); > > - ret = i915_gem_object_set_to_gtt_domain(ifbdev->fb->obj, > > - true); > > + if (ifbdev->fb->obj) > > I'm confused. Why are we doing this check now? If this is actually > needed, then the current set_to_gtt_domain() call will blow up too. So > this would be 2 different patches: one preventing the explosion, the > other doing obj_invalidate. Unless we don't need the obj check. I'm confused as well. I could swear I was just putting back an "if" that was already here. No idea where this came from and don't see a need for it... v++ on the way... > > > + intel_fb_obj_invalidate(ifbdev->fb->obj, ORIGIN_GTT); > > mutex_unlock(&fb_helper->dev->struct_mutex); > > } > > > > -- > > 2.1.0 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
