Hi Kausal,
On 03/07/15 04:31, Kausal Malladi wrote:
> This patch adds new structures in DRM layer for Palette color correction.
> These structures will be used by user space agents to configure
> appropriate number of samples and Palette LUT for a platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kausal Malladi <Kausal.Malladi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/uapi/drm/drm.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
> index d9562a2..04a8f2a 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
> @@ -863,6 +863,18 @@ struct drm_color_caps {
> struct drm_cge_caps cge_caps;
> };
>
> +struct drm_r32g32b32 {
> + __u32 r32;
> + __u32 g32;
> + __u32 b32;
> +};
> +
I don't think this will work on a 64bit kernel with 32 bit userspace...
although I'm low on caffeine I could be imagining.
> +struct drm_palette {
> + __u32 version;
> + __u32 palette_num_samples;
> + struct drm_r32g32b32 palette_lut[0];
If memory serves me right, I've mentioned earlier that using zero sized
arrays might not be so good considering portability and using non GCC
compilers.
I believe your consern was about that using a pointer is inefficient.
Can you provide some references/hints how is that so ?
Thanks
Emil
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
