On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 07:25:08PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > > With the abstractions created by the last patch, we can move this code > and the only thing inside intel_fbc.c that knows about dev_priv->mm is > the code that reads stolen_base. > > We also had to move a call to i915_gem_stolen_cleanup_compression() > - now called intel_fbc_cleanup_cfb() - outside i915_gem_stolen.c. > > v2: > - Rebase after the remove_node() changes on the previous patch. > > Requested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> No sneaky changes detected, Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
