On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 02:44:10PM -0700, Anuj Phogat wrote: > In case of YF/YS tiled buffers libdrm need not know about the tiling > format because these buffers don't have hardware support to be tiled > or detiled through a fenced region. But, libdrm still need to know > about buffer alignment restrictions because kernel uses it when > resolving the relocation. > > Mesa uses drm_intel_gem_bo_alloc_for_render() to allocate Yf/Ys buffers. > So, use the passed alignment value in this function to initialize the > align variable in drm_intel_bo. Note that we continue ignoring the > alignment value passed to drm_intel_gem_bo_alloc() to follow the > previous behavior. > > V2: Add a condition to avoid allocation from cache. (Ben) > V3: Make no changes in cache allocation strategy. Just update the alignment. > Update the aperture size estimate including the alignment. (Ben, Chris) > V4: Move aperture size adjustments inside drm_intel_bo_gem_set_in_aperture_size() > Don't split sentences across the one-line header and the changelog. (Chris) > > Signed-off-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> We have pending issues with not being 48bit safe, but I don't think this patch makes matters worse. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
