On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:41:08PM +0100, Michel Thierry wrote: > igt_assert_cmp64 and its derivatives: > - igt_assert_cmpu64 > - igt_assert_eq64 > - igt_assert_eq_u64 > - igt_assert_neq64 > - igt_assert_lte64 > - igt_assert_lt64 > > v2: Add igt_assert_cmp_t, this macro handles int, long and > double var cases. (Chris) > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > lib/igt_core.h | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/igt_core.h b/lib/igt_core.h > index 2b2b6e9..09af295 100644 > --- a/lib/igt_core.h > +++ b/lib/igt_core.h > @@ -323,6 +323,20 @@ void igt_exit(void) __attribute__((noreturn)); > */ > #define igt_fail_on_f(expr, f...) igt_assert_f(!(expr), f) > > +#define INTDECFORMAT "%d" > +#define UINTHEXFORMAT "%#x" > +#define DOUBLEDECFORMAT "%#lf" > +#define LONGHEXFORMAT "%#llx" Any particular reason? Passing in "%d" or %d would have worked just as well, right? Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
